Ang dating daan bible exposition
At the same time, he asks for the sentiments of the people regarding today’s issue. He was the one of the people who inspired me to become a journalist. I was in Apalit, Pampanga at the time, so when I came home, I was stunned and shocked about his death.
Hindi forensic ang pagkakaunawa ng Simbahan sa justification.He always deliver news straight to the point, a real “one-of” in news casting, and my best alarm clock. Taruc (real name: Jose Malagpo Taruc, Jr.) was born on Sept. He was one of the pioneers in the radio industry in the Philippines.He spearheaded the first radio station of ABS-CBN, the DZAQ Radyo Patrol.Sa tuwing nagsasalita ang Protestante tungkol sa salvation/justification ang madalas na naiisip niya ay courtroom scenario at yun ang magiging starting point ng conversation ninyo.Justification muna, tapos adoption, tapos proseso na ng sanctification.It may sound strange to most, but for someone who was greatly influenced by his charisma, it’s a once in a lifetime feeling.
Phl 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: Phl 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: Clearly, it is testified that Jesus was in the form of God and equal with God meaning, his form or nature is equally God.
“But made himself of no reputation” The Greek rendition of it is: all (but) heauton (self) eken Osen (empties) Rightly translated, it should have been like this: but empties himself THE COMPLETE TEXT: “ Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But empties himself and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:” Clearly, what it implied by “stripping off his god status” is in that essence of abasing himself as a servant so what it means by “stripping off his god status” is not the way it seem at face value that he was not God anymore but in essence a god who shed his equality with the father. ) “ Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But empties himself and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:” COULD IT BE THAT THE PHRASE “EMPTIES HIMSELF” IS INDEED AS A FORM OF ABASING HIMSELF, MEANING STRIPPING OFF HIS EQUALITY WITH GOD ONLY AND NOT REALLY DISCARDING HIS NATURE AS GOD? IF YOU CAN SEE THE ROOT WORD, “TO MAKE EMPTY” CAN BE USED FIGURATIVELY TO MEAN “TO ABASE” THATS WHY THE WORD “EMPTIES” CAN BE USED FIGURATIVELY AS SUGGESTED BY THE USAGE OF THE ROOT WORD THUS THE STRIPPING OFF THE GOD STATUS IS NOT ACTUALLY LITERAL BUT FIGURATIVE WHICH IS RATHER TO ABASE HIMSELF OR IN SHORT, TO STRIP OFF HIS EQUALITY WITH GOD YET STILL IN HIS NATURE AS GOD. (figuratively) to abase” As you can see, bro eli never said, that literally Jesus stripped off his nature as God that he was not God anymore bec noone can strip off nature, He simply mean, in the figurative sense, Jesus stripped off his god status that is in essense of terminology is, he abase himself or in short, stripped off his equality with god yet still retained his natural status, that is, God!
The problem is it clearly said this: HE EMPTIES HIMSELF=STRIPPED OFF HIS GOD STATUS COULD IT BE THAT THE PHRASE “EMPTIES HIMSELF” IS INDEED AS A FORM OF ABASING HIMSELF AND NOT REALLY DISCARDING HIS NATURE AS GOD? Why do we say, that its figurative and not literal?
During the 80’s, he worked on DWWW 630 (now DZMM), where he hosted a morning program with Noli de Castro.
In 1991, he moved to DZRH, the oldest radio station in the Philippines.
Pagdating naman sa issue ng “imputation of Christ’s righteousness”, sinasabi ng mga Protestante na hindi nagkakaroon ng sariling righteousness ang tao sa justification, itinuturing lang siyang righteous pero ang righteousness na iyon ay kay Cristo. Isa pang halimbawa ay kapag nagbuhos ka ng likidong gatas sa isang basong tubig at humawa ang gatas sa tubig.